For compliance and legal teams
An AI assistant for compliance officers.
Compliance officers and in-house legal teams use Kaer to watch regulators on a schedule, sum up what changed with links to the source and draft the first version of an impact note. You name the sources and what matters to your business. Interpretation, sign-off and anything filed with a regulator stay with your team.
What can a compliance team hand over?
The reading and the first draft. Each output is an input to your own review.
Regulator watch
Checks your list of sources on a schedule and writes up what is new, with a link to each one.
Waits for you: the Slack post or the email.
First-draft impact notes
Sets a new rule against the policy documents you give it and drafts a note on what may need to change.
Waits for you: nothing. It reads and drafts.
Evidence gathering
Signs in to the systems you name, downloads what an audit needs and files it in Google Drive.
Waits for you: nothing. Filing sends nothing.
The change register
Keeps a Google Sheet of each change, its date, its source and who owns the follow-up.
What does a compliance week look like?
You read one note in place of a dozen sites. Here is an example, built from the jobs above.
Monday
The weekly note is ready, grouped by regulator, with a link on every item.
Tuesday
You mark what matters. Kaer drafts an impact note for each of those items.
Wednesday
You rewrite the drafts in your own judgement and send them to the policy owners.
Thursday
Each change from the week is logged with its source and a named owner.
Friday
Evidence for next month's review is downloaded and filed.
What cannot be delegated?
Accountability. A tool can do the reading, and the responsibility stays with named people.
Interpretation
Kaer does not give legal advice. What a rule means for you is your decision.
Sign-off
Policy changes and attestations need a person.
Regulator contact
Filings and correspondence stay with your team.
Privileged material
Decide what may go into any third-party tool before you start.
What should you check before approving a tool like this?
These are the questions your own vendor review will ask. The security page and the Privacy Policy have the detail.
Where does the data live?
Kaer's servers and primary storage are in Germany and Finland. That covers storage, and the next row covers processing.
Who processes prompts?
The AI model providers named in the Privacy Policy, each with its country. Several are based in China or the United States, and Kaer switches to another listed provider when one fails. Check that list against your own rules.
Is my data used for training?
“Help improve our services” is on by default and you can turn it off in Settings. Kaer then stops using your work to improve its services and train its own models. Nothing is used to train third-party models.
Is there a DPA?
Yes. The Data Processing Addendum applies automatically for business use, on every plan.
Can data be left unstored?
On Enterprise, zero data retention means prompts, files and outputs are not stored once the work is done.
Questions
Is Kaer suitable for regulated firms?
Can I rely on the summaries?
Can I control who sees what?
Where to go next
How to monitor regulation changes with AI
Which sources to watch and how to set up the schedule.
How Kaer handles your data
Storage, processing, training and what waits for a person.
Kaer for Europe
Servers in Germany and Finland, and a GDPR DPA.
Enterprise
Custom roles, shared projects and zero data retention.
Start with public sources and last month's changes.
Starting is free and needs no card.